![]() Except the iPad’s display is always on behind the scenes, which is not ideal. However, this setting can be disabled, and if you do, then sure: you could close an iPad Pro and continue using iPadOS on the external display without seeing the iPad’s built-in display. This has been the iPad’s default behavior since the iPad 2 and the debut of the Smart Cover, and it still applies to the latest iPad Pro and Magic Keyboard: when the cover is closed, the iPad gets automatically locked. But this workaround will allow you to close your iPad Pro, connect a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse, and still be able to use Stage Manager on an external display.Įssentially, the method involves disabling the ‘Lock / Unlock’ toggle in Settings ⇾ Display & Brightness that controls whether the iPad’s screen should lock when a cover is closed on top of it. True clamshell mode kills the screen of the host computer and moves everything from that display to the external monitor. Now before readers start spamming the comments, this is not true clamshell mode. The catch: it doesn’t really turn off the iPad’s built-in display. Benchmark results do not turn on their head, but there will be many out there hoping that they have not overpaid for their £1449 machine.A simple setting can be used as a workaround for clamshell mode in iPadOS 17.įernando Silva of 9to5Mac came up with a clever workaround to have ‘clamshell mode’ in iPadOS 17 when an iPad is connected to an external display. Though the 2016 benchmarking scores are still preliminary and may change once the testing sample grows, it is still a bad start from a line-up that may be past its best days. Some would argue that its barely noticeable.Īfter the disappointing keynote unveiling the new flagship machine, followed by poor initial benchmark scores, Apple fanboys must feel hard done. In addition, the difference is only 600 points which shows approximately a five per-cent reduction in benchmarking-quantifiable results. Infact, the latest version of tests we obtained show it beaten by older machines too – but at this point I would like to re-iterate that this may be down to the small sample of 2016 models benchmarked so far. The benchmark results show that the Quad-core Intel Core i7 6820HQ 2.9GHz mean-machine is yet again beaten by the 2015 model. ![]() The line-up doesn’t change much from single-core to multi-core, with the exception that the 13-inch model drops out of the list. Even activating all available processor cores during the benchmarking tests didn’t do Apple’s new flagship model any favours. If you came here looking for some high-performance multi-core drama, you’ve come to the wrong place. I’m afraid you will be disappointed again. After-all, macOS is sold as a highly-optimised operating system designed to squeeze every last drop of power out of your machine for the perfect computing experience. Since Apple’s hardware is so tightly integrated with the software I tried to force the argument that the high-end MacBook would perform better when all four processor cores were in use. The HQ in the processor’s model name tells us that this processor is built with high-performance graphics and features 4 cores (quad core). This particular model features the maxed out 16GB of memory and a high-speed m2 SSD hard-drive as well as the 2.8GHz Intel Core i7 4980HQ processing chip. The single core results have the 15-inch retina MacBook Pro 2015 leading the way with just under 4300 Geekbench points. A significant majority of these videos show the 2015 model outpacing the newer TouchBar model unveiled a month ago. ![]() ![]() The most popular comparison seems to be a MacBook Pro 2015 i7 with 16GB of memory vs a MacBook Pro 2016 i7 with 16GB of memory. YouTubers have also been posting videos running demanding tasks on machines side-by-side. But, these are early results which may not accurately reflect the performance of Apple’s new line-up. It seems as though the MacBook Pro Late 2016 is slower than the older generations. Early benchmark scores for the new 2016 MacBook are beginning to surface online. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |